ABSTRACT
Introduction: TG-1701 is an irreversible, selective, novel Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) administered once daily (QD). BTK inhibitors, as well as the U2 combination (anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab + the PI3Kδ-CK1ϵ inhibitor umbralisib), are highly efficacious in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), each of which have been previously demonstrated to be superior over standard chemoimmunotherapy. Treatment with a more selective BTK inhibitor could result in improved efficacy and safety outcomes compared with ibrutinib (ALPINE study, EHA 2021), and we hypothesized that dual blockade of the B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway through combination of TG-1701 with U2 may confer greater depth of response compared to either regimen alone. Methods: Patients with CLL and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were enrolled in an ongoing Phase 1 study. After characterizing the safety profile of TG-1701 monotherapy, a parallel dose escalation arm of TG-1701+U2 was implemented. Select dose levels of TG-1701 monotherapy and TG-1701+U2 were also expanded. All patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/patient decision to withdraw. Safety was evaluated in all treated patients, and efficacy was evaluated in all treated patients who had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. TG-1701 monotherapy data were previously presented;herein we present data from the TG-1701+U2 dose escalation/expansion and the TG-1701 monotherapy CLL expansion cohorts Results: As of July 2021, 142 patients were treated with TG-1701, 36 of whom were enrolled in the TG-1701+U2 arm. The median # of prior therapies across all treated patients was 1 (range, 0-10) and all patients were BTKi-naïve. Among the 36 patients treated with U2+1701, 19 were evaluable for efficacy and safety (17 too early to evaluate). The median age was 69 years (range 47-81), and 56% were male. TG-1701+U2 was well tolerated at 4 different dose levels without dose-limiting toxicities. The most common (>30%) all-causality, all grade treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (53%) contusion (42%), nausea (37%), hypertension, ALT/AST increase, and fatigue (all 32% each) with TG-1701+U2. Grade 3/4 AEs >15% were limited to ALT/AST increase (21%). Dose reduction occurred in 1 patient due to an AE, and 4 patients discontinued at least 1 study drug due to an AE: 2 discontinued umbralisib, 1 discontinued umbralisib and TG-1701, and 1 discontinued all 3 agents. At the data cut-off, overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (4 CR and 12 PR) among 19 evaluable patients, with remaining patients awaiting post-baseline assessment. In the monotherapy CLL-specific cohorts (200 mg QD, n=20;and 300 mg QD, n=20), 40 pts were evaluable for safety, and 39 for efficacy (1 pt withdrew due to COVID prior to first response assessment). The median age was 71 (range 49-86), and 43% were male. The most common TEAEs were increased ALT/AST (all grades: 18%;grade ≥3: 3%), followed by diarrhea (all grades: 15%;grade ≥3: none), and neutropenia (all grades: 13%;grades ≥3: 13%). There were no cases of atrial fibrillation, major bleeding, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the CLL cohorts at a median follow-up of 12.8 months (range 2.5 - 20.8). TEAEs leading to TG-1701 dose reduction occurred in 1 (3%) patient. No patients in the 200 mg or 300 mg CLL cohorts have discontinued due to AEs. In patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia at baseline, sustained improvement in hematologic variables was observed. The ORR among 39 patients was 97% (all PR/PR-L). Lymphocytosis resolved to normal value or <50% of baseline in 69% (24 of 35 of patients with lymphocytosis). Consistent response rates were observed across all subgroups, including the following high-risk genomic features: del17p/TP53 mutations, unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region (IGHV), and complex karyotype (defined as 3 ≤cytogenetic abnormalities). The median duration of response has not been reached in either cohort. Best change in tumor burden from baseline in patients with CLL is presented in Figure 1. C nclusions: TG-1701 exhibits an encouraging safety and efficacy profile as monotherapy in patients with CLL and additionally shows promising activity and a manageable tolerability profile in combination with U2. Future registration trials are being planned in CLL with TG-1701. Recruitment to this study (NCT03671590) continues. (Figure Presented).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: TG-1701 is a selective, covalent BTK inhibitor administered once daily (QD). Both the 'U2' combination (anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab+the PI3Kd-CK1e inhibitor umbralisib) and BTK inhibitors are highly efficacious in treatment- naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, each having previously demonstrated superiority over standard chemoimmunotherapy. Here, we report results for patients treated with TG-1701 alone or in combination with U2 from an ongoing Phase 1 study, with a focus on patients with CLL. Methods: Patients with R/R CLL and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma were enrolled in an ongoing Phase 1 study initially evaluating dose escalation (DE) of oral TG-1701 QD continuously administered in 28-day cycles (100, 200, 300, and 400 mg). After characterizing the safety profile of TG-1701 monotherapy, we implemented a parallel DE arm of TG-1701+U2. Select dose levels of TG-1701 monotherapy were also expanded. All patients were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/patient decision to withdraw. Safety was evaluated in all treated patients, and efficacy was evaluated in all treated patients with CLL who had at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Results: As of 30 April 2021, 125 patients were treated with TG-1701, 49 of whom had CLL. Enrollment was: 25 patients in the monotherapy DE arm (6 with CLL), 61 in the 200-mg disease-specific cohorts (20 CLL [5 TN], 21 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL, 4 TN], 20 Waldenström's macroglobulinemia [WM, 8 TN]), 20 in the 300-mg CLL cohort (4 TN), and 19 in the 1701+U2 DE arm (3 with CLL). Patients with MCL or WM in the 200-mg disease-specific cohorts were excluded from this analysis. The median # of prior therapies among CLL patients was 1 (range, 0-5) and all patients were BTKi-naïve. TG-1701 was well-tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose for monotherapy was not reached up to 400mg (near 100% saturation of the BTK at all dose levels studied). In the DE arms, the most common all-causality treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were constipation (32%), increased ALT (28%), bruising (28%), and upper respiratory tract infection (28% of patients) with TG-1701 monotherapy;diarrhea (53%) and bruising (42%) with TG-1701+U2. Grade 3/4 AEs were limited. In the CLL-specific cohorts, the most common TEAE was increased ALT/AST (all grades, 17.5%;grade 3, 2.5%;grade ≥4, none), followed by diarrhea (all grades, 12.5%;grade ≥3, none), and COVID-19 (all grades, 12.5%;grade 3-4, none;grade 5, 7.5%). There were no cases of atrial fibrillation, major bleeding, or ventricular tachyarrhythmia in the CLL cohorts at a median follow-up of 10.5 months. TEAEs leading to TG-1701 dose reduction occurred in 7.5% of patients. TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 7.5% of patients (all COVID-19). At the data cut-off, 48 patients with CLL were evaluable for response, including nine in DE. ORR was 95.6% for TG-1701 monotherapy (all PR/PR-L) and 100% for TG-1701+U2 (all PR). The median duration of response has not been reached in either cohort. The best change from baseline in tumor burden in patients with CLL is presented in Figure 1, and treatment exposure and response duration data are presented in Figure 2 below. In patients with anemia and thrombocytopenia at baseline, sustained improvement in hematologic variables was observed in the 200- and 300-mg cohorts. Lymphocytosis was observed in 70% of the monotherapy patients, with a resolution to normal or <50% of baseline in 57.1%. Consistent response rates were observed across all subgroups, including age and high-risk genomic features, such as del17p/TP53, unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable-region (IGHV), and complex karyotype (defined as three or more cytogenetic abnormalities). Time to event data will be reported at the time of presentation. Conclusions: TG-1701 exhibits an encouraging safety and efficacy profile in patients with CLL, with promising activity and a manageable tolerability profile as monotherapy and in combination with U2 (Figure 1). Future registration trials ar being planned in CLL with TG-1701. Recruitment to this study (NCT03671590) continues.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND Patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) lack good treatment options, particularly in the relapsed and refractory setting (Mak V et al. J Clin Oncol 2013). The development of the targeted therapies in PTCL has been lagging behind those developed for B cell lymphomas. Our work suggested that combinations of epigenetic therapies can be a safe and effective approach for patients with PTCL, particularly those with T-cell lymphomas with a follicular helper phenotype (Marchi E et al. Br. J Haematol 2015;O'Connor O.A. et al;Blood 2019;Falchi L et al. Blood 2020). While the reason for this is not clear, it is thought recurrent mutations in epigenetic factors, including Ten-Eleven Translocation-2 (TET2), DNA methyl transferase-3A (DNMT3A) and isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) may contribute for their increased vulnerability (Couronné L. et al. N Eng J Med 2012;Lemonnier F et al. Blood 2012). Despite these presumptions, a direct explanation for the sensitivity to epigenetic based treatment remains to be established. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the merits of romidepsin plus subcutaneous azacitidine in patients with PTCL when administered in a ‘real-world’ scenario. METHODS We retrospectively identified PTCL patients that were treated with azacitidine and romidepsin outside of a clinical trial based upon queries regarding off study use. The study was reviewed and approved by each Medical Center Institutional Review Board. We have identified 13 patients world-wide whose pretreatment characteristics are shown in Table 1. These patients were treated using 3 different schedules: Schedule A: azacitidine 75mg/m2 s.c. on days 1-7, romidepsin 14 mg/m2 on day 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle (total of 6 patients);Schedule B: azacitidine 75mg/m2 s.c. on days 1-5, romidepsin 14 mg/m2 on day 8, 15 and 22 of a 35 day cycle;and Schedule C (total of 2 patients): azacitidine 75mg/m2 s.c. on days 1-7, romidepsin 12-14 mg/m2 on day 8, 15 and 22 of a 28 day cycle (total of 5 patients). RESULTS We retrospectively identified 13 patients that were treated with romidepsin and azacitidine off study. Ten patients had angioimmunoblastic lymphoma (AITL), 2 had adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) and 1 had PTCL-NOS. Eight of the 13 patients had next generation sequencing performed. Most common mutations found were those of TET2 (5 pts), RHOA (4pts), IDH2 (3pts) and DNMT3A (1 pt). One ATLL patient had mutations in TRAF3, FAT1 and MED12. Among these 13 patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 84% and the complete response rate (CR) was 61%. Median number of cycles was 3 (range 1-12). Treatment was well tolerated but notable adverse effects included nausea, fatigue, rash, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. One patient experienced febrile neutropenia while another had pulmonary infiltrates (differential diagnosis included drug toxicity versus infection). Thrombocytopenia was the most common reason for dose reduction of romidepsin (to 12mg/m2) or its omission on day 8, 15 or 22. In 3 patients, azacitidine and romidepsin were used to achieve remission prior to allogeneic transplant (range of cycles 1-3), with all 3 patients were in CR at their last disease assessment. One patient died of transplant related mortality 8 months after his allogeneic stem cell transplant. There was 1 patient with AITL (treatment naïve) noted to have progression of disease at first imaging following 2 cycles of romidepsin and azacitidine. On the day of her PET/CT, she was however diagnosed with symptomatic Covid19 infection and was hospitalized. A repeat PET/CT 6 weeks later (without any additional lymphoma treatment) revealed PR. CONCLUSIONS Subcutaneous azacitidine and romidepsin administered in a ‘real-world’ situation is highly effective in patients with relapsed PTCL with tolerable toxicity, and can be used to successfully bridge patients to stem cell transplant. Notably, the efficacy was similar to the one reported on a clinical study with oral azacitidine and romidepsin. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Kalac: Astra Zeneca: Consultancy;Kyowa Kirin Consultancy;Gilead: Consultancy;Johnson and Johnson: Research Funding;Guidepoint: Consultancy;GLG: Consultancy. Tam: Beigene: Research Funding;Janssen: Research Funding;Abbvie: Research Funding;Loxo: Honoraria;Beigene: Honoraria;Janssen: Honoraria;Abbvie: Honoraria. Montanari: Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. O'Connor: Servier: Research Funding;Mundipharma: Honoraria;Myeloid Therapeutics: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kymera: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Astex: Research Funding;BMS: Research Funding;Merck: Research Funding;TG Therapeutics: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Marchi: BMS: Research Funding;Astex: Research Funding;Merck: Research Funding;Myeloid Therapeutics: Honoraria;Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria;Kymera Therapeutics: Other: Scientific Advisor.
ABSTRACT
Background: Blinatumomab, a bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE ®) molecule that directs cytotoxic T-cells to lyse CD19-expressing B lineage cells, has been investigated in NHL (Goebeler JCO 2016, Viardot Blood 2016, Katz ASH 2019). Here, we evaluated subcutaneous (SC) blinatumomab, which may simplify administration, improve convenience, and potentially reduce adverse events (AEs). Methods: Patients (pts;≥18 y) had indolent NHL (follicular, marginal zone, lymphoplasmacytic, mantle cell, or small lymphocytic) that was primary refractory (1+ prior line), relapsed (within 1 y of first response), or that had responded to initial therapy for ≥1 y and relapsed after 2+ lines, including an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. Disease must not have been irradiated and was measurable (≥1.5 cm) on PET-CT or CT. Pts had a 3-wk continuous intravenous (cIV) run-in period followed by SC dosing in 5 cohorts, a further 2 wks of cIV dosing, and the option for a second cycle of cIV dosing (Figure). The primary objective was safety and tolerability of SC blinatumomab;secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK), estimating the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), ie, the highest dose at which ≤1/6 pts had a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and efficacy (NCT 02961881). Results: Pts (n=29) had a median (range) age of 64 (42-75) y, 55% were male, 90% Caucasian, with follicular I-IIIA (76%), marginal zone (10%), mantle cell (10%) and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (3%) subtypes;no pts had prior allo-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), 38% had prior auto-HSCT. Of the 29 pts, 5 discontinued (D/C) blinatumomab due to AEs (n=3;2 cIV, 1 SC), pt request (1), and disease progression (1);no pts D/C due to COVID-19 control measures;26 pts completed the study;pts received a median (range) of 5 (3-10) doses. AEs leading to D/C in SC treatment included neurologic events of aphasia and seizure. During SC dosing, 2 DLTs occurred (aphasia, n=1;seizure, n=1 ). MTD was not reached. Five pts had grade 3 (G3) AEs (thrombocytopenia, erosive esophagitis, asthenia, device-related infection, hyperglycemia, aphasia, seizure;pts may have had >1 G3 AE);there were no G4 AEs or fatal AEs. AEs of interest included neurologic events (all, n=15;G3, n=2), infection (2;1), and cytokine release syndrome (4;0). One pt had grade 1 injection site erythema. Anti-blinatumomab antibodies have not been detected to date. Preliminary PK results were consistent across the 5 SC cohorts and 3 different dosing regimens. Following the first dose, maximum concentrations (C max) were reached after ~5-12 hours and exposures (C max and area under concentration-time curve [AUC] from 0-12 hours) increased in a dose-related manner. At steady state, exposures (AUC over the dosing interval) increased in a dose-related manner for dosing intervals of once every 12, 24, and 48 hours across cohorts. Blinatumomab bioavailability and apparent terminal elimination half-life were favorable for extending the dosing interval to once every other day and potentially longer intervals. The steady-state concentrations during both cIV infusion periods were consistent with those previously reported in NHL pts. In all pts, the overall response rate (ORR, representative of cIV, 5 wks and SC, 1wk) per Cheson criteria was 69% (evaluable, n=23: complete response [CR], 21%;partial response [PR], 48%;cycle 1 [C1], n=22: ORR, 62%;CR, 14%;PR,48%;cycle 2 [C2], n=17: 45%;17%;28%;respectively);per Lugano criteria, the ORR was 52% (n=21: CR, 24%;PR, 28%;C1, n=18: 45%;17%;28%;C2, n=12: 31%;21%;10%);for follicular lymphoma, ORR was 77% per Cheson (n=19: CR, 23%;PR, 55%) and 55% per Lugano (n=15: CR, 23%;PR, 32%). Conclusions: In pts with R/R indolent NHL, SC blinatumomab had a favorable safety profile, with the caveat that pts who could not tolerate cIV blinatumomab did not advance to SC dosing. Efficacy was comparable with that seen for cIV dosing in prior blinatumomab NHL studies. In contrast to prior blinatumomab trials, no dose dependency in efficacy or toxicity was observed because SC dosi g was administered for only 1 wk, after 3 wks of cIV;pts not tolerating cIV did not receive SC dosing. Safety/tolerability of blinatumomab SC administration over the whole cycle is currently being evaluated in a phase 1 trial of pts with R/R acute lymphoblastic leukemia (NCT 04521231). SC blinatumomab PK, including bioavailability and half-life, showed promising features, warranting further investigation. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Rossi: Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Sanofi: Honoraria;Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria;Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Prince: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding;Novartis: Honoraria. Tam: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria;AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Loxo: Consultancy;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria;Novartis: Honoraria;Pharmacyclics: Honoraria. Ku: Roche: Consultancy;Genor Biopharma: Consultancy;Antegene: Consultancy. Thieblemont: Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding;Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Cellectis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Hospira: Research Funding;Bayer: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Popplewell: Pfizer: Other: Travel;Hoffman La Roche: Other: Food;Novartis: Other: Travel. Wermke: Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Haioun: Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company);Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy;Celgene: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company);Novartis: Honoraria;Amgen: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company);Servier/Pfizer: Honoraria;Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria;Takeda: Consultancy;Miltenyi Biotec: Consultancy. Viardot: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;University Hospital of Ulm: Current Employment. Ferreri: Pfizer: Research Funding;x Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Amgen: Research Funding;Genmab: Research Funding;BMS: Research Funding;Hutchison Medipharma: Research Funding;PletixaPharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Adienne: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding;Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding;Ospedale San Raffaele srl: Patents & Royalties;Beigene: Research Funding. Wong: Amgen: Current Employment;Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Kadu: IQVIA: Current Employment. Zugmaier: Amgen: Current Employment;Micromet/Amgen: Patents & Royalties: Patents 20190300609 and 20130323247 licensed;receives royalties of family members of international applications published as WO2010/052014;WO2010/052013;WO2011/051307;WO2012/055961;WO 2012/062596;WO2014/122251;and WO2015/181683;Amgen: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Zeng: Amgen: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Rambaldi: Celgene: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses;Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy;Astellas Pharma: Consultancy;Novartis: Consultancy;Omeros: Consultancy, Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabelDisclosure: Blinatumomab is approved in the United States for administration as a continuous intravenous infusion. It has not been approved for subcutaneous administration.
ABSTRACT
Background: Ibrutinib (ibr) is a once-daily Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved in the US for patients (pts) with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who have received ≥1 prior therapy. Venetoclax (ven) is a BCL-2 inhibitor approved for pts with CLL or previously untreated AML. Ibr + ven have shown synergistic antitumor activity in preclinical models and complementary clinical activity in early phase studies (Zhao Br J Haematol 2015;Tam NEJM 2018;Jain NEJM 2019). The ongoing phase 3 SYMPATICO study (PCYC-1143-CA, NCT03112174) evaluates the safety and efficacy of ibr + ven in pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. A safety run-in (SRI) was conducted to inform whether a 1-month (mo) ibr lead-in would be implemented for the randomized portion of the study;initial data from the SRI evaluating tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) events and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) concluded that the study would proceed with concurrent ibr + ven, with no ibr lead-in (Wang ICML 2019). Updated safety and efficacy from the SRI are presented. Methods: The phase 3 SYMPATICO study is comprised of an open-label SRI and a double-blind randomized period. Key eligibility criteria were pathologically confirmed MCL with measurable disease, 1-5 prior therapies, and no prior treatment with BTK or BCL inhibitors. In the SRI, pts received oral, once-daily 560 mg ibr + ven in a 5-week ramp-up to 400 mg ven. Ibr + ven are dosed concurrently for 2 years;thereafter, ven is discontinued in all pts and ibr is continued until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint of the SRI was occurrence of TLS events and DLTs. Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) per the 2014 Lugano criteria, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR). Rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) were assessed in bone marrow and peripheral blood. Efficacy and safety were analyzed by TLS risk (low or high). TP53 mutational status was determined by next-generation sequencing. Results: Twenty-one pts were enrolled in the SRI, with a median time on study of 22 (range, 2-31) mo. The median age was 68 (range, 53-84) years, and the median number of prior therapies was 2 (range, 1-4);6 pts were considered at low risk for TLS and 15 pts were considered at high risk for TLS. All pts had at least 1 lesion >2 cm at baseline;11/21 (52%) had baseline detectable MRD in peripheral blood or bone marrow. Of the 11 pts with available TP53 mutation data, 4 (36%) had mutated TP53. Median time on treatment was 18 (range, <1-28) mo. During the 5-week ven ramp-up, 3 pts had DLTs, and 1 pt at high risk for TLS had a laboratory TLS (Wang ICML 2019);no additional TLS events occurred during follow-up. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were diarrhea (n=16 [76%]) and fatigue (n=11 [52%]). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 17 pts (81%). Four pts (19%) discontinued study drugs because of TEAEs. Two treatment-emergent deaths occurred: 1 from a retroperitoneal hemorrhage unrelated to ibr or ven that was related to disease progression and 1 from COVID-19 in a pt with CR. The overall response rate (ORR) was 81% (17/21) in all pts, with an ORR of 83% (5/6) in the cohort at low risk for TLS and 80% (12/15) in the cohort at high risk for TLS (Figure). Sixty-two percent (13/21) of pts had CR (low risk for TLS, 67% [4/6];high risk for TLS, 60% [9/15]), 19% (4/21) of pts had PR (low risk for TLS, 17% [1/6];high risk for TLS, 20% [3/15]);5% (1/21) of all pts had stable disease, and 10% (2/21) had PD;1 pt was unevaluable. The median DOR has not been reached (95% CI, 17.5 mo-NE). The median PFS per investigator assessment was not reached (95% CI, 13.7 mo-NE);estimated PFS at 18 mo was 75% (95% CI: 50%-89%) (Figure). All 11 pts with detectable MRD at baseline achieved undetectable MRD, including 7 pts who achieved CRs. Conclusions: Ibr + ven is an all-oral, once-daily, chemotherapy-free regimen being studied for treatment of pts with R/R MCL. With a median of 22 mo on study, no new safety signals we e observed;TLS events and DLTs were rare. Ibr + ven had sustained efficacy, with an ORR of 81%, CR rate of 62%, and the median PFS not reached. All MRD-assessable pts achieved undetectable MRD. The ongoing randomized portion of the SYMPATICO study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of ibr + ven compared with ibr + placebo in pts with R/R MCL;additionally, a single-arm, open-label cohort in previously untreated pts, including pts with TP53 mutations, is ongoing. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Tam: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding;Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding;BeiGene: Honoraria, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Honoraria. Ramchandren: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding;Janssen: Research Funding. Chen: Autolus Therapeutics: Current Employment. Karlin: Sanofi: Honoraria;Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees;Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support;AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support;Celgene: Other: Personal fees;GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees;Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, personal fees. Chong: Hutchison Medipharma: Research Funding;Bayer: Research Funding;Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding;Servier: Research Funding;Isofol: Research Funding;Merck Serono: Research Funding;Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding. Jurczak: AstraZeneca, Epizyme: Consultancy;BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding;Sandoz Novartis: Consultancy;Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding;Acerta: Consultancy;Loxo: Consultancy;TG Therapeutics, Acerta, Bayer, MeiPharma: Research Funding;Merck: Research Funding;Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company,: Research Funding;Roche: Research Funding;Takeda: Research Funding. Bishton: AbbVie: Research Funding;Gilead: Other: Travel/accomodations/expenses, Research Funding;Roche: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding;Takeda: Other: Travel/accommodations/expenses, Research Funding;Janssen: Consultancy. Collins: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria;Celleron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau;Taekda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau;Amgen: Research Funding;Celgene: Research Funding;MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding;Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau;Pfizer: Honoraria;Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau;BeiGene: Consultancy. Szafer-Glusman: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment. Lee: AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company;Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment. Eckert: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment;AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Neuenburg: Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Current Employment;AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Wang: Targeted Oncology: Honoraria;InnoCare: Consultancy;Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding;Nobel Insights: Consultancy;Guidepoint Global: Consultancy;Dava Oncology: Honoraria;Acerta Pharma: Research Funding;Verastem: Research Funding;OMI: Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses;Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;Molecular Templates: Re earch Funding;AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;OncLive: Honoraria;Lu Daopei Medical Group: Honoraria;Beijing Medical Award Foundation: Honoraria;MoreHealth: Consultancy;Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;Loxo Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding;Pulse Biosciences: Consultancy;Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Other: Travel, accommodation, expenses, Research Funding;Juno: Consultancy, Research Funding;VelosBio: Research Funding;BioInvent: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib in combination with venetoclax is not approved in any indication
ABSTRACT
Background: TG-1701 is a selective, covalent BTK inhibitor administered once daily (QD). Both the 'U2' combination (anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab + the PI3Kδ-CK1ϵ inhibitor umbralisib) and BTK inhibition are highly active in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, each having previously demonstrated superiority over standard chemoimmunotherapy. Here we report the results of the dose escalation of TG-1701 monotherapy and TG-1701+U2. Methods: Pts with R/R CLL and lymphoma were enrolled in a Ph 1 study initially evaluating dose escalation (DE) of oral TG-1701 QD continuously administered in 28-day cycles (100, 200, 300, and 400 mg). After characterizing the safety profile of TG-1701 monotherapy, we implemented a parallel DE arm of TG-1701+U2. Select dose levels of TG-1701 monotherapy were expanded in CLL, MCL and Waldenström's (WM). All pts were treated until disease progression. The primary objectives are to characterize the safety profile and define the recommended Ph 2 doses for the drugs alone and in combination. Results: As of 03 February 2021, 123 pts were treated with TG-1701: 25 in the monotherapy DE arm, 61 in the 200 mg disease-specific cohorts (20 CLL [5 TN], 21 MCL [4 TN], 20 WM [8 TN]), 20 in the 300 mg CLL cohort (4 TN), and 17 in the 1701+U2 DE arm. The median # of prior therapies was 1 (range, 1 -10). All pts were BTKi-naïve. All 123 pts were evaluable for safety. TG-1701 was well tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for monotherapy was not reached at 400 mg (demonstrating near 100% saturation of the BTK at all dose levels studied). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) of clinical interest included atrial fibrillation (AF 4.0% of pts, G ≥3 in 1 case), G ≥3 hypertension (2.4%), and bleeding events (18.7%, all G1-2). No cases of ventricular tachyarrhythmia were reported. TEAEs leading to TG-1701 dose reduction occurred in 6.5% of pts. TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 1.6% of pts (AF, COVID-19). At the data cut-off, 119 pts were evaluable for response, including 40 in DE (Table). The median duration of response has not been reached among responders overall. The median follow-up (mFU range) was 15.9 mos (1.3 -28.6+) in DE and 8.5 mos (1.4 -15.6+) in disease-specific cohorts. Conclusions: TG1701 exhibits an encouraging safety and efficacy profile. The combination of 1701+U2 has been well tolerated and dose escalation continues. The combination shows enhanced depth of response over TG-1701 monotherapy. Recruitment to this study continues. Response per investigator review by treatment group.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: TG-1701 is a selective, covalent BTK inhibitor administered once daily (QD). Both the “U2” combination (anti-CD20 mAb ublituximab + the PI3Kδ-CK1ϵ inhibitor umbralisib) and BTK inhibition are highly active in treatment-naïve (TN) and relapsed/ refractory (R/R) CLL, each having previously demonstrated superiority over standard chemoimmunotherapy. Herein we report the results of the dose escalation of TG-1701 monotherapy and TG-1701+U2. Methods: Patients (pts) with R/R CLL, MCL and Waldenström's (WM) were enrolled in an ongoing Ph 1 study initially evaluating dose escalation (DE) of oral TG-1701 QD continuously administered in 28-day cycles (100, 200, 300, and 400 mg). After characterizing the safety profile of TG-1701 monotherapy, we implemented a parallel DE arm of TG-1701+U2. Select dose levels of TG-1701 monotherapy were expanded. All pts were treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or investigator/patient decision to withdraw. Results: As of 03 February 2021, 123 pts were treated with TG-1701 as follows: 25 in the monotherapy DE arm, 61 in the 200 mg disease-specific cohorts (20 CLL [5 TN], 21 MCL [4 TN], 20 WM [8 TN]), 20 in the 300 mg CLL cohort (4 TN), and 17 in the 1701+U2 DE arm. The median # of prior therapies was 1 (range, 1-10). All pts were BTKi-naïve. All 123 pts were evaluable for safety. TG-1701 was well tolerated and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for monotherapy was not reached at 400 mg (demonstrating near 100% saturation of the BTK at all dose levels studied). Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) of clinical interest included atrial fibrillation (AF 4.0% of pts, G ≥3 in 1 case), G ≥3 hypertension (2.4%), and bleeding events (18.7%, all G1-2). No cases of ventricular tachyarrhythmia were reported. TEAEs leading to TG-1701 dose reduction occurred in 6.5% of pts. TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 1.6% of pts (AF, COVID-19). At the data cut-off, 119 pts were evaluable for response, including 40 in DE (Table). The median duration of response has not been reached among responders overall. The median follow-up (mFU range) was 15.9 mos (1.3-28.6+) in DE and 8.5 mos (1.4-15.6+) in disease-specific cohorts. Best change from baseline in tumor burden in pts in the 1701+U2 combination arm is presented in the figure below. Conclusions: TG-1701 exhibits an encouraging safety and efficacy profile. The combination of 1701+U2 has been well tolerated and dose escalation continues. The combination shows enhanced depth of response over TG-1701 monotherapy.